You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting universal financial protection: a case study of new management of community health insurance in Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josephine Borghi, Stephen Maluka, August Kuwawenaruwa, Suzan Makawia, Juma Tantau, Gemini Mtei, Mariam Ally, Jane Macha |
| Abstract |
The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), a compulsory formal sector scheme took over the management of the Community Health Fund (CHF), a voluntary informal sector scheme, in 2009. This study assesses the origins of the reform, its effect on management and reporting structures, financial flow adequacy, reform communication and acceptability to key stakeholders, and initial progress towards universal coverage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,655,128
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#396
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,787
of 196,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.