You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comments to Role of upper airway ultrasound in airway management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-016-0204-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wan-Ching Lien |
Abstract |
Tracheal ultrasound can be an alternative diagnostic tool in airway management, besides traditional confirmatory methods such as capnography and auscultation. The standard image is a hyperechoic air-mucosa (A-M) interface with a reverberation artifact posteriorly (comet-tail artifact). If the second A-M interface appears, which we call a "double-tract sign," esophageal intubation is considered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 21% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 64% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,159,639
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#453
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,505
of 433,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.