↓ Skip to main content

Cultural change and loss of ethnoecological knowledge among the Isthmus Zapotecs of Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 731)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cultural change and loss of ethnoecological knowledge among the Isthmus Zapotecs of Mexico
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfredo Saynes-Vásquez, Javier Caballero, Jorge A Meave, Fernando Chiang

Abstract

Global changes that affect local societies may cause the loss of ecological knowledge. The process of cultural change in Zapotec communities of the Oaxacan Isthmus intensified during the first years of the 20th century due to industrial and agro-industrial modernization projects and an increase in the level of formal schooling. Based on the case of the Oaxacan Isthmus, this study assesses the relationship between cultural change and the loss of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 36%
Environmental Science 18 12%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,348,635
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#24
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,114
of 197,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.