↓ Skip to main content

Structural and functional diversities in lepidopteran serine proteases

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and functional diversities in lepidopteran serine proteases
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, March 2006
DOI 10.2478/s11658-006-0012-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay Srinivasan, Ashok Giri, Vidya Gupta

Abstract

Primary protein-digestion in Lepidopteran larvae relies on serine proteases like trypsin and chymotrypsin. Efforts toward the classification and characterization of digestive proteases have unraveled a considerable diversity in the specificity and mechanistic classes of gut proteases. Though the evolutionary significance of mutations that lead to structural diversity in serine proteases has been well characterized, detailing the resultant functional diversity has continually posed a challenge to researchers. Functional diversity can be correlated to the adaptation of insects to various host-plants as well as to exposure of insects to naturally occurring antagonistic biomolecules such as plant-derived protease inhibitors (PIs) and lectins. Current research is focused on deciphering the changes in protease specificities and activities arising from altered amino acids at the active site, specificity-determining pockets and other regions, which influence activity. Some insight has been gained through in silico modeling and simulation experiments, aided by the limited availability of characterized proteases. We examine the structurally and functionally diverse Lepidopteran serine proteases, and assess their influence on larval digestive processes and on overall insect physiology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 26%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 19%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#463
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,928
of 92,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.