You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A virtual shopping test for realistic assessment of cognitive function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sayaka Okahashi, Keiko Seki, Akinori Nagano, Zhiwei Luo, Maki Kojima, Toshiko Futaki |
| Abstract |
Cognitive dysfunction caused by brain injury often prevents a patient from achieving a healthy and high quality of life. By now, each cognitive function is assessed precisely by neuropsychological tests. However, it is also important to provide an overall assessment of the patients' ability in their everyday life. We have developed a Virtual Shopping Test (VST) using virtual reality technology. The objective of this study was to clarify 1) the significance of VST by comparing VST with other conventional tests, 2) the applicability of VST to brain-damaged patients, and 3) the performance of VST in relation to age differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,044
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,583
of 209,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.