↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure
Published in
BMC Psychology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-7283-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siu-man Ng

Abstract

Despite its popularity, the psychometric properties of the 10-item Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in working adults are yet to be evaluated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,761,855
of 12,476,678 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#184
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,691
of 148,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,476,678 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.