↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure
Published in
BMC Psychology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-7283-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siu-man Ng

Abstract

Despite its popularity, the psychometric properties of the 10-item Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in working adults are yet to be evaluated.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,386,010
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#500
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,055
of 196,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.