↓ Skip to main content

Cdc25 and Wee1: analogous opposites?

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Division, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 160)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cdc25 and Wee1: analogous opposites?
Published in
Cell Division, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1747-1028-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A Perry, Sally Kornbluth

Abstract

Movement through the cell cycle is controlled by the temporally and spatially ordered activation of cyclin-dependent kinases paired with their respective cyclin binding partners. Cell cycle events occur in a stepwise fashion and are monitored by molecular surveillance systems to ensure that each cell cycle process is appropriately completed before subsequent events are initiated. Cells prevent entry into mitosis while DNA replication is ongoing, or if DNA is damaged, via checkpoint mechanisms that inhibit the activators and activate the inhibitors of mitosis, Cdc25 and Wee1, respectively. Once DNA replication has been faithfully completed, Cdc2/Cyclin B is swiftly activated for a timely transition from interphase into mitosis. This sharp transition is propagated through both positive and negative feedback loops that impinge upon Cdc25 and Wee1 to ensure that Cdc2/Cyclin B is fully activated. Recent reports from a number of laboratories have revealed a remarkably complex network of kinases and phosphatases that coordinately control Cdc25 and Wee1, thereby precisely regulating the transition into mitosis. Although not all factors that inhibit Cdc25 have been shown to activate Wee1 and vice versa, a number of regulatory modules are clearly shared in common. Thus, studies on either the Cdc25 or Wee1-regulatory arm of the mitotic control pathway should continue to shed light on how both arms are coordinated to smoothly regulate mitotic entry.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 182 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,791
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Division
#5
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,922
of 86,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Division
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them