You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Galipeau, David Moher, Becky Skidmore, Craig Campbell, Paul Hendry, D William Cameron, Paul C Hébert, Anita Palepu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 33% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,254,657
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#365
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,686
of 209,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.