Title |
Genetic relatedness analysis reveals the cotransmission of genetically related Plasmodium falciparum parasites in Thiès, Senegal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13073-017-0398-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wesley Wong, Allison D. Griggs, Rachel F. Daniels, Stephen F. Schaffner, Daouda Ndiaye, Amy K. Bei, Awa B. Deme, Bronwyn MacInnis, Sarah K. Volkman, Daniel L. Hartl, Daniel E. Neafsey, Dyann F. Wirth |
Abstract |
As public health interventions drive parasite populations to elimination, genetic epidemiology models that incorporate population genomics can be powerful tools for evaluating the effectiveness of continued intervention. However, current genetic epidemiology models may not accurately simulate the population genetic profile of parasite populations, particularly with regard to polygenomic (multi-strain) infections. Current epidemiology models simulate polygenomic infections via superinfection (multiple mosquito bites), despite growing evidence that cotransmission (a single mosquito bite) may contribute to polygenomic infections. Here, we quantified the relatedness of strains within 31 polygenomic infections collected from patients in Thiès, Senegal using a hidden Markov model to measure the proportion of the genome that is inferred to be identical by descent. We found that polygenomic infections can be composed of highly related parasites and that superinfection models drastically underestimate the relatedness of strains within polygenomic infections. Our findings suggest that cotransmission is a major contributor to polygenomic infections in Thiès, Senegal. The incorporation of cotransmission into existing genetic epidemiology models may enhance our ability to characterize and predict changes in population structure associated with reduced transmission intensities and the emergence of important phenotypes like drug resistance that threaten to undermine malaria elimination activities. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pakistan | 1 | 33% |
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
Researcher | 11 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |