↓ Skip to main content

Different immune responses to three different vaccines following H6N1 low pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge in Taiwanese local chicken breeds

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different immune responses to three different vaccines following H6N1 low pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge in Taiwanese local chicken breeds
Published in
BMC Proceedings, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-5-s4-s33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi-Sheng Chang, Michèle Tixier-Boichard, Olympe Chazara, Yen-Pai Lee, Chih-Feng Chen, Poa-Chun Chang, Jan-Wei Chen, Bertrand Bed’hom

Abstract

H6N1 low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) are frequently isolated in Taiwan and lead to significant economic losses, either directly or indirectly through association with other infectious diseases. This study investigates immune responses to three different vaccines following a H6N1 challenge in different local breeds.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#318
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,611
of 111,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#33
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.