↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark J Kelly, Frank D Dunstan, Keith Lloyd, David L Fone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Psychology 25 17%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,039
of 5,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,522
of 99,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.