↓ Skip to main content

Splenic tuberculosis presenting as fever of unknown origin with severe neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Splenic tuberculosis presenting as fever of unknown origin with severe neutropenia
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-0711-12-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nahla A Azzam

Abstract

Fever of undetermined origin always poses a challenging problem to the physician. Tuberculosis is an important health problem in developing countries. It is mostly seen in immune-compromised patients. And it is one of the common causes of fever of unknown origin. I am reporting a case of a splenic tuberculosis in 48 years old male who is not known of any immune deficiency state, he was presented with 3 weeks history of fever and found to have severe neutropenia and with negative work up for all hematological, rheumatological and malignant causes. A computerized tomography scan of the abdomen confirmed splenic enlargement with multiples hypo dense lesions consist with either splenic infection or splenic lymphoma so exploratory splenectomy was performed. Histological examination revealed granulomatouse inflammation with numerous acid fast bacilli consist with tuberculosis. He was started on four anti-tuberculouse drugs. in less than one week his fever subside with normalization of his neutrophilic count.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,926,576
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#142
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,552
of 196,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them