You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phylogenomics with incomplete taxon coverage: the limits to inference
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-10-155 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael J Sanderson, Michelle M McMahon, Mike Steel |
Abstract |
Phylogenomic studies based on multi-locus sequence data sets are usually characterized by partial taxon coverage, in which sequences for some loci are missing for some taxa. The impact of missing data has been widely studied in phylogenetics, but it has proven difficult to distinguish effects due to error in tree reconstruction from effects due to missing data per se. We approach this problem using a explicitly phylogenomic criterion of success, decisiveness, which refers to whether the pattern of taxon coverage allows for uniquely defining a single tree for all taxa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 8% |
Brazil | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 179 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 28% |
Researcher | 61 | 28% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 10% |
Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 76% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,928
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,585
of 105,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.