You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in total body bone mineral density following a common bone health plan with two versions of a unique bone health supplement: a comparative effectiveness research study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel E Michalek, Harry G Preuss, Harry A Croft, Patti L Keith, Samuel C Keith, Monika Dapilmoto, Nicholas V Perricone, Robert B Leckie, Gilbert R Kaats |
| Abstract |
The US Surgeon General's Report on Bone Health suggests America's bone-health is in jeopardy and issued a "call to action" to develop bone-health plans that: (1) improve nutrition, (2) increase health literacy and, (3) increase physical activity. This study is a response to this call to action. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,384,971
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#673
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,305
of 120,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.