↓ Skip to main content

Correctional nursing: a study protocol to develop an educational intervention to optimize nursing practice in a unique context

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correctional nursing: a study protocol to develop an educational intervention to optimize nursing practice in a unique context
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Almost, Wendy A Gifford, Diane Doran, Linda Ogilvie, Crystal Miller, Don N Rose, Mae Squires

Abstract

Nurses are the primary healthcare providers in correctional facilities. A solid knowledge and expertise that includes the use of research evidence in clinical decision making is needed to optimize nursing practice and promote positive health outcomes within these settings. The institutional emphasis on custodial care within a heavily secured, regulated, and punitive environment presents unique contextual challenges for nursing practice. Subsequently, correctional nurses are not always able to obtain training or ongoing education that is required for broad scopes of practice. The purpose of the proposed study is to develop an educational intervention for correctional nurses to support the provision of evidence-informed care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Psychology 9 10%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 28 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,684,609
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#732
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,279
of 198,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.