You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0394-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren Mawn, Emily J. Oliver, Nasima Akhter, Clare L. Bambra, Carole Torgerson, Chris Bridle, Helen J. Stain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 50% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Sweden | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 13% |
Researcher | 30 | 11% |
Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 12% |
Unknown | 96 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 49 | 18% |
Psychology | 36 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 104 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#912,225
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#118
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,336
of 429,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.