You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measures of frailty in population-based studies: an overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Bouillon, Mika Kivimaki, Mark Hamer, Severine Sabia, Eleonor I Fransson, Archana Singh-Manoux, Catharine R Gale, G David Batty |
| Abstract |
Although research productivity in the field of frailty has risen exponentially in recent years, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the measurement of this syndrome. This overview offers three services: first, we provide a comprehensive catalogue of current frailty measures; second, we evaluate their reliability and validity; third, we report on their popularity of use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 414 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 14% |
| Researcher | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 102 | 24% |
| Unknown | 79 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 164 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 12% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 104 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,508,634
of 25,225,182 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#927
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,814
of 203,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.