↓ Skip to main content

How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare?
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-8-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danica Rotar-Pavlič, Igor Švab, Raymond Wetzels

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 5 10%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,772
of 3,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,822
of 79,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them