You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do governance choices matter in health care networks?: an exploratory configuration study of health care networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-229 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annick Willem, Paul Gemmel |
Abstract |
Health care networks are widely used and accepted as an organizational form that enables integrated care as well as dealing with complex matters in health care. However, research on the governance of health care networks lags behind. The research aim of our study is to explore the type and importance of governance structure and governance mechanisms for network effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
Researcher | 18 | 20% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Engineering | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,690,153
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,256
of 7,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,080
of 196,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#94
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.