↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-13-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meilan Xu, Zeheng Xu, Baohui Liu, Fanjiang Kong, Yasutaka Tsubokura, Satoshi Watanabe, Zhengjun Xia, Kyuya Harada, Akira Kanazawa, Testuya Yamada, Jun Abe

Abstract

Absence of or low sensitivity to photoperiod is necessary for short-day crops, such as rice and soybean, to adapt to high latitudes. Photoperiod insensitivity in soybeans is controlled by two genetic systems and involves three important maturity genes: E1, a repressor for two soybean orthologs of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (GmFT2a and GmFT5a), and E3 and E4, which are phytochrome A genes. To elucidate the diverse mechanisms underlying photoperiod insensitivity in soybean, we assessed the genotypes of four maturity genes (E1 through E4) in early-flowering photoperiod-insensitive cultivars and their association with post-flowering responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Psychology 1 <1%
Energy 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,668,752
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#646
of 3,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,528
of 197,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.