You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using the yes/no recognition response pattern to detect memory malingering
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychology, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2050-7283-1-12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Schindler, Johanna Kissler, Klaus-Peter Kühl, Rainer Hellweg, Thomas Bengner |
Abstract |
Detection of feigned neurocognitive deficits is a challenge for neuropsychological assessment. We conducted two studies to examine whether memory malingering is characterized by an elevated proportion of false negatives during yes/no recognition testing and whether this could be a useful measure for assessment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 19% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 10 | 48% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,689,809
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#518
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,365
of 196,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.