↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing hospital workers' willingness to report to duty in an influenza pandemic through threat- and efficacy-based assessment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing hospital workers' willingness to report to duty in an influenza pandemic through threat- and efficacy-based assessment
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ran D Balicer, Daniel J Barnett, Carol B Thompson, Edbert B Hsu, Christina L Catlett, Christopher M Watson, Natalie L Semon, Howard S Gwon, Jonathan M Links

Abstract

Hospital-based providers' willingness to report to work during an influenza pandemic is a critical yet under-studied phenomenon. Witte's Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) has been shown to be useful for understanding adaptive behavior of public health workers to an unknown risk, and thus offers a framework for examining scenario-specific willingness to respond among hospital staff.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,236,746
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,335
of 14,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,961
of 93,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.