↓ Skip to main content

Useful screening tools for preventing foot problems of diabetics in rural areas: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Useful screening tools for preventing foot problems of diabetics in rural areas: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chia-Hao Chang, Yun-Shing Peng, Chang-Cheng Chang, Mei-Yen Chen

Abstract

Preventing diabetic foot problems (DFP) and their associated consequences is a critical in rural regions. The objective is to present an association of non-invasive DFP assessment tools and physiological indicators for early detection among rural cases of diabetes in Taiwan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2013.
All research outputs
#12,878,328
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,917
of 14,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,115
of 196,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#157
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.