↓ Skip to main content

Complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis genome: methods, tools, protocols and the final release

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis genome: methods, tools, protocols and the final release
Published in
BMC Biology, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J Haas, Jennifer R Wortman, Catherine M Ronning, Linda I Hannick, Roger K Smith, Rama Maiti, Agnes P Chan, Chunhui Yu, Maryam Farzad, Dongying Wu, Owen White, Christopher D Town

Abstract

Since the initial publication of its complete genome sequence, Arabidopsis thaliana has become more important than ever as a model for plant research. However, the initial genome annotation was submitted by multiple centers using inconsistent methods, making the data difficult to use for many applications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 99 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Computer Science 5 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 14 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,051,556
of 9,148,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#717
of 968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,514
of 127,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,148,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.