You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Floodplain management in temperate regions: is multifunctionality enhancing biodiversity?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-2-10 |
| Authors |
Stefan Schindler, Michaela Kropik, Katrin Euller, Stuart W Bunting, Christiane Schulz-Zunkel, Anna Hermann, Christa Hainz-Renetzeder, Robert Kanka, Volker Mauerhofer, Viktor Gasso, Andreas Krug, Sophie G Lauwaars, Klaus Peter Zulka, Klaus Henle, Maurice Hoffmann, Marianna Biró, Franz Essl, Sophie Jaquier, Lukács Balázs, Gábor Borics, Stephanie Hudin, Christian Damm, Martin Pusch, Theo van der Sluis, Zita Sebesvari, Thomas Wrbka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,306,822
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#128
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,607
of 208,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.