You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investment case for improving maternal and child health: results from four countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-601 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliana Jimenez Soto, Sophie La Vincente, Andrew Clark, Sonja Firth, Alison Morgan, Zoe Dettrick, Prarthna Dayal, Bernardino M Aldaba, Soewarta Kosen, Aleli D Kraft, Rajashree Panicker, Yogendra Prasai, Laksono Trisnantoro, Beena Varghese, Yulia Widiati, Investment Case Team for India, Indonesia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea and the Philippines |
| Abstract |
Without addressing the constraints specific to disadvantaged populations, national health policies such as universal health coverage risk increasing equity gaps. Health system constraints often have the greatest impact on disadvantaged populations, resulting in poor access to quality health services among vulnerable groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Researcher | 42 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,831,341
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,183
of 15,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,040
of 199,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#115
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.