↓ Skip to main content

Cameroonian medicinal plants: a bioactivity versus ethnobotanical survey and chemotaxonomic classification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cameroonian medicinal plants: a bioactivity versus ethnobotanical survey and chemotaxonomic classification
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fidele Ntie-Kang, Lydia Likowo Lifongo, Luc Meva’a Mbaze, Nnange Ekwelle, Luc C Owono Owono, Eugene Megnassan, Philip N Judson, Wolfgang Sippl, Simon M N Efange

Abstract

In Cameroon herbs are traditionally used to meet health care needs and plans are on the way to integrate traditional medicine in the health care system, even though the plans have not been put into action yet. The country however has a rich biodiversity, with ~8,620 plant species, some of which are commonly used in the treatment of several microbial infections and a range of diseases (malaria, trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, diabetes and tuberculosis).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 17%
Chemistry 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,690,328
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,590
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,378
of 196,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#46
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.