You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walk well: a randomised controlled trial of a walking intervention for adults with intellectual disabilities: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-620 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Mitchell, Craig Melville, Kirsten Stalker, Lynsay Matthews, Alex McConnachie, Heather Murray, Andrew Walker, Nanette Mutrie |
| Abstract |
Walking interventions have been shown to have a positive impact on physical activity (PA) levels, health and wellbeing for adult and older adult populations. There has been very little work carried out to explore the effectiveness of walking interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities. This paper will provide details of the Walk Well intervention, designed for adults with intellectual disabilities, and a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test its effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
| Psychology | 23 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,210,015
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,481
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,514
of 194,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.