You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correlates of walking and cycling for transport and recreation: factor structure, reliability and behavioural associations of the perceptions of the environment in the neighbourhood scale (PENS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J Adams, Anna Goodman, Shannon Sahlqvist, Fiona C Bull, David Ogilvie |
| Abstract |
Emerging evidence suggests that walking and cycling for different purposes such as transport or recreation may be associated with different attributes of the physical environment. Few studies to date have examined these behaviour-specific associations, particularly in the UK. This paper reports on the development, factor structure and test-retest reliability of a new scale assessing perceptions of the environment in the neighbourhood (PENS) and the associations between perceptions of the environment and walking and cycling for transport and recreation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 27% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,308,946
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,386
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,724
of 206,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#17
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.