You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors associated with patient, and diagnostic delays in Chinese TB patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Li, John Ehiri, Shenglan Tang, Daikun Li, Yongqiao Bian, Hui Lin, Caitlin Marshall, Jia Cao |
| Abstract |
Delay in seeking care is a major impediment to effective management of tuberculosis (TB) in China. To elucidate factors that underpin patient and diagnostic delays in TB management, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors that are associated with delays in TB care-seeking and diagnosis in the country. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 21% |
| Researcher | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#1,471,455
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,038
of 3,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,422
of 194,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.