↓ Skip to main content

What explains the socioeconomic status gap in activity? Educational differences in determinants of physical activity and screentime

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What explains the socioeconomic status gap in activity? Educational differences in determinants of physical activity and screentime
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3880-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nelli Hankonen, Matti T. J. Heino, Emilia Kujala, Sini-Tuuli Hynynen, Pilvikki Absetz, Vera Araújo-Soares, Katja Borodulin, Ari Haukkala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 77 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Psychology 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 94 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,477,242
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,693
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,671
of 428,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.