You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why Changes in Price Matter When Thinking About Marijuana Policy: A Review of the Literature on the Elasticity of Demand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03391701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Russell Lundberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 43% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,230,234
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#60
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,428
of 320,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.