↓ Skip to main content

Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,562)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
153 X users
facebook
41 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review
Published in
Reproductive Health, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12978-016-0264-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. U. Lokugamage, S. D. C. Pathberiya

Abstract

This review describes the emerging global debate on the role of human rights childbirth. It is also tailored to a UK perspective in view of the Montgomery v. Lanarkshire [2015] legal ruling and it implications to practice. We can never underestimate the power of humane care on health. The compassion and evidence based medicine agenda in healthcare is interconnected with human rights in healthcare, feeding into the principles of decision making and patient centred care. When this has not happened and there is been healthcare conflict, the power of storytelling serves to connect disparate parties to their common humanity. Narratives are an important aspect of restorative justice processes and we suggest that this could be beneficial in the field of human rights in childbirth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 18 7%
Professor 12 5%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 72 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 16%
Social Sciences 32 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 79 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#362,741
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#22
of 1,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,041
of 432,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.