↓ Skip to main content

Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have no effect on a human T-lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I)-infected cell line from patients with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have no effect on a human T-lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I)-infected cell line from patients with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy
Published in
BMC Immunology, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12865-017-0191-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoichi Fukui, Hideki Nakamura, Yoshiko Takahashi, Naoki Iwamoto, Hiroo Hasegawa, Katsunori Yanagihara, Tatsufumi Nakamura, Akihiko Okayama, Atsushi Kawakami

Abstract

While tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (TNFi) and other biologics are very effective against autoimmune diseases, they can also cause infectious diseases. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether the TNFi sometimes used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) complicated with human T-lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I) infection have the unintended side effect of promoting HTLV-I proliferation. We used the HTLV-I-infected cell line HCT-5, derived from spinal fluid cells of a patient with HTLV-I associated myelopathy, to evaluate the production of cytokines and chemokines, TNF-α receptor (TNFR), the expression of HTLV-I associated genes, the HTLV-I proviral load (PVL), the expression of HTLV-I structural protein, and apoptosis. We used Jurkat cells as a control. Supernatants of HCT-5 showed time-dependent elevations of IL-6, RANTES and ICAM-1. HCT-5 supernatants treated with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept (ETN), golimumab and certolizumab pegol showed no significant differences in the levels of these molecules compared to the control. Neither TNFR1 nor TNFR2 expression was altered by any TNFi treatment, relative to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) treatment, with the exception that TNFR2 was significantly decreased and internalized in HCT-5 cells by ETN treatment. The HTLV-I associated genes Tax and HBZ and the PVL levels were not significantly changed. Immunofluorescence staining of HCT-5 for an HTLV-I-associated protein, GAG, was also not significantly different between any of the TNFi treatments and the PBS treatment. DNA ladders as an index of apoptosis were not detected. Apoptotic cells were not increased by the addition of any TNFi. In vitro, TNFi did not affect the cytokine profiles, expression of associated genes and proteins, proviral load or apoptosis of HCT-5 cells. The results suggested that TNFi treatment of RA patients complicated with HTLV-I might have no effect on HTLV-I infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,873,766
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#381
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,933
of 420,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.