↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features and outcome of cryptogenic hepatocellular carcinoma compared to those of viral and alcoholic hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features and outcome of cryptogenic hepatocellular carcinoma compared to those of viral and alcoholic hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang Soo Lee, Sook-Hyang Jeong, Young-Sang Byoun, Seong Min Chung, Mun Hyuk Seong, Hyung Rae Sohn, Bo-young Min, Eun Sun Jang, Jin-Wook Kim, Guan Jung Park, Yoon Jin Lee, Kyoung Ho Lee, Soyeon Ahn

Abstract

Cryptogenic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is thought to arise due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study investigated the prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes of cryptogenic HCC and compared them with those of HCC related to hepatitis B virus infection (HBV-HCC), hepatitis C virus infection (HCV-HCC), and alcohol (ALC-HCC) in Korea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 23 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,369
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,419
of 8,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,746
of 194,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#55
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.