↓ Skip to main content

Controlled, blinded force platform analysis of the effect of intraarticular injection of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells associated to PRGF-Endoret in osteoarthritic dogs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlled, blinded force platform analysis of the effect of intraarticular injection of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells associated to PRGF-Endoret in osteoarthritic dogs
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose M Vilar, Manuel Morales, Angelo Santana, Giuseppe Spinella, Mónica Rubio, Belen Cuervo, Ramón Cugat, Jose M Carrillo

Abstract

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) therapy in regenerative medicine is a rapidly growing area of research and is currently also being used to treat osteoarthritis (OA). Force platform analysis has been consistently used to verify the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of OA in dogs, but never with AD-MSC.The aim of this study was to use a force platform to measure the efficacy of intraarticular ADMSC administration for limb function improvement in dogs with severe OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 159 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 39 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,311,993
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#904
of 3,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,877
of 194,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.