You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank J Manion, Robert J Robbins, William A Weems, Rebecca S Crowley |
| Abstract |
Data protection is important for all information systems that deal with human-subjects data. Grid-based systems--such as the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG)--seek to develop new mechanisms to facilitate real-time federation of cancer-relevant data sources, including sources protected under a variety of regulatory laws, such as HIPAA and 21CFR11. These systems embody new models for data sharing, and hence pose new challenges to the regulatory community, and to those who would develop or adopt them. These challenges must be understood by both systems developers and system adopters. In this paper, we describe our work collecting policy statements, expectations, and requirements from regulatory decision makers at academic cancer centers in the United States. We use these statements to examine fundamental assumptions regarding data sharing using data federations and grid computing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 8% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 132 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 35 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,869,728
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#599
of 2,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,041
of 119,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.