↓ Skip to main content

Targeting insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes via immune modulation of cord blood-derived multipotent stem cells (CB-SCs) in stem cell educator therapy: phase I/II clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes via immune modulation of cord blood-derived multipotent stem cells (CB-SCs) in stem cell educator therapy: phase I/II clinical trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Zhao, Zhaoshun Jiang, Tingbao Zhao, Mingliang Ye, Chengjin Hu, Huimin Zhou, Zhaohui Yin, Yana Chen, Ye Zhang, Shanfeng Wang, Jie Shen, Hatim Thaker, Summit Jain, Yunxiang Li, Yalin Diao, Yingjian Chen, Xiaoming Sun, Mary Beth Fisk, Heng Li

Abstract

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing worldwide and creating a significant burden on health systems, highlighting the need for the development of innovative therapeutic approaches to overcome immune dysfunction, which is likely a key factor in the development of insulin resistance in T2D. It suggests that immune modulation may be a useful tool in treating the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 25%
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,355,475
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#953
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,855
of 195,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.