You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A quantitative atlas of histone modification signatures from human cancer cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epigenetics & Chromatin, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-8935-6-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary LeRoy, Peter A DiMaggio, Eric Y Chan, Barry M Zee, M Andres Blanco, Barbara Bryant, Ian Z Flaniken, Sherry Liu, Yibin Kang, Patrick Trojer, Benjamin A Garcia |
| Abstract |
An integral component of cancer biology is the understanding of molecular properties uniquely distinguishing one cancer type from another. One class of such properties is histone post-translational modifications (PTMs). Many histone PTMs are linked to the same diverse nuclear functions implicated in cancer development, including transcriptional activation and epigenetic regulation, which are often indirectly assayed with standard genomic technologies. Thus, there is a need for a comprehensive and quantitative profiling of cancer lines focused on their chromatin modification states. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 34% |
| Researcher | 51 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,393,980
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#21
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,516
of 195,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.