↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of non‐IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy in infancy ‐ a UK primary care practical guide

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 520)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and management of non‐IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy in infancy ‐ a UK primary care practical guide
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-3-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina Venter, Trevor Brown, Neil Shah, Joanne Walsh, Adam T Fox

Abstract

The UK NICE guideline on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Food Allergy in Children and Young People was published in 2011, highlighting the important role of primary care physicians, dietitians, nurses and other community based health care professionals in the diagnosis and assessment of IgE and non-IgE-mediated food allergies in children. The guideline suggests that those with suspected IgE-mediated disease and those suspected to suffer from severe non-IgE-mediated disease are referred on to secondary or tertiary level care. What is evident from this guideline is that the responsibility for the diagnostic food challenge, ongoing management and determining of tolerance to cow's milk in children with less severe non-IgE-mediated food allergies is ultimately that of the primary care/community based health care staff, but this discussion fell outside of the current NICE guideline. Some clinical members of the guideline development group (CV, JW, ATF, TB) therefore felt that there was a particular need to extend this into a more practical guideline for cow's milk allergy. This subset of the guideline development group with the additional expertise of a paediatric gastroenterologist (NS) therefore aimed to produce a UK Primary Care Guideline for the initial clinical recognition of all forms of cow's milk allergy and the ongoing management of those with non-severe non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy in the form of algorithms. These algorithms will be discussed in this review paper, drawing on guidance primarily from the UK NICE guideline, but also from the DRACMA guidelines, ESPGHAN guidelines, Australian guidelines and the US NIAID guidelines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Other 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 31 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2021.
All research outputs
#921,580
of 17,883,304 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#26
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,225
of 165,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,883,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.