↓ Skip to main content

Development and implementation of the Baltimore healthy carry-outs feasibility trial: process evaluation results

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and implementation of the Baltimore healthy carry-outs feasibility trial: process evaluation results
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung Hee Lee-Kwan, Sonja Goedkoop, Rachel Yong, Benjamin Batorsky, Vanessa Hoffman, Jayne Jeffries, Mohamed Hamouda, Joel Gittelsohn

Abstract

Prepared food sources, including fast food restaurants and carry-outs, are common in low-income urban areas. These establishments provide foods high in calories, sugar, fat, and sodium. The aims of the study were to (1) describe the development and implementation of a carry-out intervention to provide and promote healthy food choices in prepared food sources, and (2) to assess its feasibility through a process evaluation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 20%
Social Sciences 21 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#831,738
of 20,114,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#871
of 13,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,579
of 171,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,114,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them