↓ Skip to main content

Development and implementation of the Baltimore healthy carry-outs feasibility trial: process evaluation results

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and implementation of the Baltimore healthy carry-outs feasibility trial: process evaluation results
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung Hee Lee-Kwan, Sonja Goedkoop, Rachel Yong, Benjamin Batorsky, Vanessa Hoffman, Jayne Jeffries, Mohamed Hamouda, Joel Gittelsohn

Abstract

Prepared food sources, including fast food restaurants and carry-outs, are common in low-income urban areas. These establishments provide foods high in calories, sugar, fat, and sodium. The aims of the study were to (1) describe the development and implementation of a carry-out intervention to provide and promote healthy food choices in prepared food sources, and (2) to assess its feasibility through a process evaluation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Social Sciences 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,250,307
of 16,699,900 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,633
of 11,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,827
of 160,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,699,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them