↓ Skip to main content

Intraguild relationships between sympatric predators exposed to lethal control: predator manipulation experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraguild relationships between sympatric predators exposed to lethal control: predator manipulation experiments
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin L Allen, Lee R Allen, Richard M Engeman, Luke K-P Leung

Abstract

Terrestrial top-predators are expected to regulate and stabilise food webs through their consumptive and non-consumptive effects on sympatric mesopredators and prey. The lethal control of top-predators has therefore been predicted to inhibit top-predator function, generate the release of mesopredators and indirectly harm native fauna through trophic cascade effects. Understanding the outcomes of lethal control on interactions within terrestrial predator guilds is important for zoologists, conservation biologists and wildlife managers. However, few studies have the capacity to test these predictions experimentally, and no such studies have previously been conducted on the eclectic suite of native and exotic, mammalian and reptilian taxa we simultaneously assess. We conducted a series of landscape-scale, multi-year, manipulative experiments at nine sites spanning five ecosystem types across the Australian continental rangelands to investigate the responses of mesopredators (red foxes, feral cats and goannas) to contemporary poison-baiting programs intended to control top-predators (dingoes) for livestock protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 48%
Environmental Science 24 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,015,309
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#54
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,280
of 206,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.