↓ Skip to main content

A pilot study of Aboriginal health promotion from an ecological perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot study of Aboriginal health promotion from an ecological perspective
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel E Reilly, Marion Cincotta, Joyce Doyle, Bradley R Firebrace, Margaret Cargo, Gemma van den Tol, Denise Morgan-Bulled, Kevin G Rowley

Abstract

For health promotion to be effective in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities, interventions (and their evaluation) need to work within a complex social environment and respect Indigenous knowledge, culture and social systems. At present, there is a lack of culturally appropriate evaluation methods available to practitioners that are capable of capturing this complexity. As an initial response to this problem, we used two non-invasive methods to evaluate a community-directed health promotion program, which aimed to improve nutrition and physical activity for members of the Aboriginal community of the Goulburn-Murray region of northern Victoria, Australia. The study addressed two main questions. First, for members of an Aboriginal sporting club, what changes were made to the nutrition environment in which they meet and how is this related to national guidelines for minimising the risk of chronic disease? Second, to what degree was the overall health promotion program aligned with an ecological model of health promotion that addresses physical, social and policy environments as well as individual knowledge and behaviour?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 36%
Student > Master 30 17%
Researcher 16 9%
Unspecified 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Unspecified 13 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 22 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,236,801
of 21,343,037 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,231
of 13,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,161
of 173,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them