↓ Skip to main content

Induction of an EMT-like transformation and MET in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of an EMT-like transformation and MET in vitro
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Songming Ding, Wu Zhang, Zhiyuan Xu, Chunyang Xing, Haiyang Xie, Haijun Guo, Kanjie Chen, Penghong Song, Yu Gu, Fengqiang Xiao, Lin Zhou, Shusen Zheng

Abstract

The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) play pivotal roles in metastasis of epithelial cancers. The distinction between them has shed new light on the molecular mechanisms of tumor metastasis. Recently, tumor microenvironment (TM) has been identified as one of the most potent inducers of EMT and MET. TM is characterized by its complexity and flexibility. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the exact effect of each distinct TM component on the evolution hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Engineering 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,155,645
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#669
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,586
of 194,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.