↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness and limitations of E-cadherin and β-catenin in the classification of breast carcinomas in situ with mixed pattern

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness and limitations of E-cadherin and β-catenin in the classification of breast carcinomas in situ with mixed pattern
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-8-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas S Gomes, Simone S Porto, Rafael M Rocha, Helenice Gobbi

Abstract

The distinction between lobular neoplasia of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ has important therapeutic implications. In some cases, it is very difficult to determine whether the morphology of the lesion is ductal or lobular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of E-cadherin and β-catenin expression through the immunophenotypical characterization of carcinoma in situ with mixed pattern (CISM).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 13%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,623,847
of 16,578,610 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#785
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,273
of 160,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,578,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.