↓ Skip to main content

An overview of current practice in external beam radiation oncology with consideration to potential benefits and challenges for nanotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Nanotechnology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An overview of current practice in external beam radiation oncology with consideration to potential benefits and challenges for nanotechnology
Published in
Cancer Nanotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12645-017-0027-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond B. King, Stephen J. McMahon, Wendy B. Hyland, Suneil Jain, Karl T. Butterworth, Kevin M. Prise, Alan R. Hounsell, Conor K. McGarry

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been a significant evolution in the technologies and techniques employed within the radiation oncology environment. Over the same period, extensive research into the use of nanotechnology in medicine has highlighted a range of potential benefits to its incorporation into clinical radiation oncology. This short communication describes key tools and techniques that have recently been introduced into specific stages of a patient's radiotherapy pathway, including diagnosis, external beam treatment and subsequent follow-up. At each pathway stage, consideration is given towards how nanotechnology may be combined with clinical developments to further enhance their benefit, with some potential opportunities for future research also highlighted. Prospective challenges that may influence the introduction of nanotechnology into clinical radiotherapy are also discussed, indicating the need for close collaboration between academic and clinical staff to realise the full clinical benefit of this exciting technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Unspecified 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,329,603
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#66
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,847
of 420,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.