↓ Skip to main content

Improved resistance to ischemia and reperfusion, but impaired protection by ischemic preconditioning in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved resistance to ischemia and reperfusion, but impaired protection by ischemic preconditioning in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-11-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Engbersen, Niels P Riksen, Marc J Mol, Bert Bravenboer, Otto C Boerman, Patrick Meijer, Wim JG Oyen, Cees Tack, Gerard A Rongen, Paul Smits

Abstract

In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), cardiovascular events are more common, and the outcome following a myocardial infarction is worse than in nondiabetic subjects. Ischemic or pharmacological preconditioning are powerful interventions to reduce ischemia reperfusion (IR)-injury. However, animal studies have shown that the presence of T1DM can limit these protective effects. Therefore, we aimed to study the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning in patients with T1DM, and to explore the role of plasma insulin and glucose on this effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#827
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,181
of 172,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.