↓ Skip to main content

Review of methodologies and a protocol for the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of methodologies and a protocol for the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of wheat
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-1-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huw D Jones, Angela Doherty, Huixia Wu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 324 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 22%
Researcher 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 214 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 16%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Environmental Science 3 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 47 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,488,444
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#197
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,931
of 365,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.