↓ Skip to main content

Adhoc electromagnetic compatibility testing of non-implantable medical devices and radio frequency identification

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adhoc electromagnetic compatibility testing of non-implantable medical devices and radio frequency identification
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-12-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth J Seidman, Joshua W Guag

Abstract

The use of radiofrequency identification (RFID) in healthcare is increasing and concerns for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) pose one of the biggest obstacles for widespread adoption. Numerous studies have documented that RFID can interfere with medical devices. The majority of past studies have concentrated on implantable medical devices such as implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This study examined EMC between RFID systems and non-implantable medical devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 24%
Computer Science 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#222
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,610
of 206,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.