You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapeutic arthropods and other, largely terrestrial, folk-medicinally important invertebrates: a comparative survey and review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-017-0136-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Benno Meyer-Rochow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#508,671
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#9
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,037
of 426,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.